Most people don't care about security until it's too late.
They entrust their data to large companies simply because those
companies are large and well-known. Those companies generate massive
profits without charging for service, but this doesn't raise any
flags for most consumers. It shocks people to discover that
free-service providers readily distribute their data. Trust should
be honored, but in many cases, it isn't. It is unwise to dispense
valuable information casually; think about what happens if it
escapes.
Hackers think about escaping data.
They want to catch it. Groups like the Chaos Computer Club flourish
because so many people find data theft amusing. Other groups sell
this information or use it for political purposes. Some hackers are
honest thieves, but the worst ones hide. Worse than any hacker,
though, are governments and companies. Some employees of these
organizations, if not the organizations themselves, will misuse this
information. They have easy access to the information of thousands
or millions of people, simply because those people trust them.
The internet survives on trust, and
lack of trust will kill the internet. A complete lack of trust is
the consequence of too much trust. People who trust too much will be
betrayed at some point. They will then get scared and refuse to
trust again. In contrast, trust in small amounts is easy to grant
and replace; the risk is low. Internet users should trust only when
necessary, and they should be conscious of their own (in)security.
If they are wise, the internet can blossom into a grand community.
If most users are foolish, the internet will collapse into a ghost
town.
I was inspired to think this way about
trust by The Cuckoo's Egg, which is a fascinating book. It
reads like a novel, but it isn't a work of fiction. The author, Dr.
Stoll, should have been a professional writer. Of course, if he had
chosen that occupation, he'd never have had the experiences that made
the book so interesting.
No comments:
Post a Comment